When did the American Dream of home ownership actually
became the American Dream? City planners today seem to be pushing the idea that
this is some aberrant impulse that struck our country after World War II. The
evidence in Easton seems to suggest otherwise with entrepreneurs creating
subdivisions as early as the 1890s. I recently set out to discover if the
typical shovel worker of the mid-nineteenth century could achieve home
ownership.
Almost immediately complications arose. There were hundreds
of shovel workers throughout the century-too many to examine every one. That
led me to the 1850 U. S. census, the first one to list all household members
and occupations. I thought it would provide a simple snapshot of one set of
shovel makers. It quickly became apparent that the complications weren’t over.
In North Easton there were people listed as shovel workers and people
listed as laborers, lots of laborers. Checking other data like the 1855 state census
it was clear that many, perhaps almost all laborers in North Easton worked for
the shovel company. Inevitably, some farm laborer or day laborer would sneak
into my calculations unless I undertook a time consuming search of the shovel
company archives. A further complication was that all the census takers and tax
collectors of the era were Yankees who couldn’t spell an Irish name the same
way twice to save their lives! Was Patric Conlin the same person as Patrick
Conlan? You would think Patric age 20 in 1850 would be Patrick age 25 in 1855.
You’d think that until you actually looked at the records and discovered that
Paddy, a young man displaced by famine, may only have had the roughest idea of
when he was born! So lets say until I get a chance to look at those payroll
records we are looking at “shovel workers” which are not exactly the same thing
as real shovel workers. In other words add an “ish” to any hard numbers you
read below.
In 1850 I identified 123 shovel workers. Three were English
immigrants, 66 were Irish immigrants and the remaining 54 were born in New
England. Once the workers were identified I developed some research questions:
Who had been a family head in Easton a decade earlier in 1840? Of the “class”
of 1850 who remained in Easton for five years? For ten years? Who stayed in
Easton until they died? And how many ever achieved home ownership?
There was a clear difference between the Americans and the
Irish immigrants. In 1850 only ten of the 54 Americans were listed as laborers
instead of shovel workers while 30 of 66 Irish immigrants were laborers. Many
of the Americans were clearly remnants of the original work force that Old
Oliver Ames drew from his Easton neighbors. Ten of the 54 were already head of
a household in 1840. Only two Irishmen can be identified in the 1840 census as
a household head and a shovel company employee in 1850. Thirty of the Americans
stayed in Easton until they died compared to only 19 of the Irish.
There was apparently a high turnover in shovel company
employees. Of the 54 Americans only 25
(46%) were still working at the Ames Company five years later and only
20 (37%) remained a decade later. Among the Irish, 27 (41%) remained five years
and 19 (29%) lasted the entire decade. In our mound of numbers today, the
turnover rates between the Americans and the Irish are the most similar. The
ongoing Industrial Revolution provided many opportunities for workers and they clearly
took advantage of them. It would be interesting to know how many men who
started the decade at the shovel works moved on to different factory work and
how many became small time entrepreneurs in their own right.
Only one Irishman owned his own home in 1850 compared to ten
Americans. This is perhaps a reflection of a number of older American workers
in the study group who we would consider to be “townies.” A researcher could
look at the amount of property owned in 1860 and make an educated guess as to
whether it was a house or simply land, but I chose to look at tax records for
1861 and 1870. Remember we are now looking at shovel workers in 1850 who owned
houses in 1861 and/or 1870 not necessarily shovel workers in 1861 or 1870 who
owned houses. The homeowners were those men who “made it” in Easton whether
they remained in the shovel works or not.
Of the original 54 Americans in the study, 14 (26%) owned a
home here in 1870 down from 16 in 1861. Among the original 66 Irishmen only
nine (14%) had become homeowners by 1870 up from seven in 1861. Not a terribly
high percentage for either group, but let’s look more closely.
How many of our class of 1850 who were still here in 1860
achieved homeownership? These are the people one would assume were putting down
roots here. Among Americans nine (64%) of the 14 Massachusetts born workers had
achieved homeownership by 1860. Most of these homeowners had “Easton” names
like Andrews, Packard, Willis, and Randall. John Bisbee had been working in the
shovel shops since the War of 1812 and Lucius Seaver became enough of an Easton
institution to get a street named after him. These homeowners were already
townies.
Interestingly, the story is different when we look at the
out-of-staters. None of the seven workers from Maine and New Hampshire had
achieved homeownership by 1861 (two would by 1870). This is even a poorer
record than that of the Irish immigrants. Conceivably, this group made their
money and then went home to their native states.
Among the immigrants, all three Englishmen came to Easton to
stay. They all eventually died in town. One had achieved homeownership by 1861
and a second did so by 1870. The third Englishman, John Reed, died in 1869.
Among the nineteen Irish who stayed a decade five (26%) had bought a house by
1861. Three more had bought homes by 1870. Thus, within 20 years 42% of the
Irish who “toughed it out” at the shovel works had become homeowners. Whether they
bought a home or not, these men became Eastoners; fifteen of the nineteen died
in town. Further study is needed in later censuses and valuations to see if
others became homeowners in later years.
The employees who were here in 1850 worked at the original
shop on the Island. In fact, it was a member of our study group, Patrick Quinn,
who was probably responsible for the fire that led to the construction of the
shovel plant we now know. Did the new workers in the 1855 census have a
different experience from the older workers? The study of this group is a
little more complicated than the original 1850 workers, but I’ll try to present
some information in the coming days.
What can we conclude about the class of 1850? First, the
distinction made between laborers and shovel men especially when so many of the
laborers of 1850 became shovel workers in the 1855 state census seems to
indicate a pattern of discrimination against the Irish. Evidence from the Ames
family and political history have made it clear this prejudice existed and our
data further supports this view. Whether this was discrimination on the part of
the census taker or the company, awaits further research.
Second, persistence at shovel making among both Americans
and immigrants was not particularly high. The relatively small differences
between the groups can easily be explained by the higher percentage of
Americans with long standing ties to the community. These roots also explain
the high percentage of homeownership among the Massachusetts born workers who
stayed at the shovel works throughout the decade of the 1850s. Other Americans persisted
at shovel making, but did not put down roots.
Finally, 79% of the nineteen Irish who worked at the shovel
company during the decade beginning in 1850 remained to die in Easton. Only 42%
achieved homeownership in their first twenty years in town. For the Irish was
the shovel company an “American Dream Factory?” Would more of this persistent
group have become homeowners by 1880 or 1890? Or was this generation of Irish
founding fathers content to put down roots here without desiring to or being
able to afford a home of their own? My guess, always pending further research,
is that this generation through hard work achieved whatever dream of life in
America they had back in the old country. In one way or another, the Ames
shovel company enabled the achievement of the American Dream.
No comments:
Post a Comment